Join the Conversation

10 Comments

  1. Once the quite secluded neighborhood begins to develop and out of towners move in the beautiful nature and native folks that grew up and owned the property for decades are pushed out and, in this case, pushed out by government. One must look into the who and why the town continued to be aggressive to obtain the property. Someone, somewhere could be related to someone in government that wants this property, keep in mind its Middletown and what goes on behind the scenes is almost criminal.

  2. Overzealous government authority?
    This is a gentleman who inherited a family property that apparently got out of control in various ways. It also sounds like the extenuating circumstances do not help with the problem. While I believe in the rule of law, this seems like one of those times where the power and control of a zoning official has gone too far. Blight, to this degree, does not happen overmuch in any one residential area, and as sympathetic as I can be for the nearby neighbors, why don’t the officials offer any help in solving the problem, as opposed to the massive fines being incurred daily? Or is this just another way to place a suffocating burden on someone just to take their property away?

    1. Neighbors dont care. When they need something to fix a problem they often come to me and if I have it its theirs. Have done volunteer work for Middletown Historical society, Vets museum, voting, recycling, etc

      I worked hard all my life never made much money, enoughto meet my needs for money and interesting employment. I paid almost all the property taxes since My dad died in 2003, other than the properties I am financialy done. SS and a tiny pension, I am 71 yrs old. The two former owner brothers have abandoned the situation. I had to borrow from a friend to pay off fines, back taxes; more fines piled on immediatly. I do not have a lawyer, tried to find one at the beginning but none want to go up against a city, gave up looking and represented my self,,,you know what they say about that.

  3. I agree completely with Ms. Neri. Mr. Smith has already paid considerable fines for his negligence. Kudos to Mayor Nocera for ending the imposition of additional fees. The focus should be on helping him get the property cleaned up. As for the rule about keeping lawns under 8″, I would like to see such laws altered to allow landowners to let their lawns revert to forest if they wish to.

    1. Negligence is a strong word. It does not appear that he is harming anyone, plus both the cars and plants are intentional. Why should he be required to change his way of life? He was clearly there before the neighbor chose to move in and before any of these rules were made that force character change on Middletown. With all the known corruption in city hall, this is just another overstep to micromanage people’s lives and rake in cash they didn’t earn.

    2. Correction: fines are once again accumulating. The mayor doesnt have control of this once P&Z “adjudicates” them at the courthouse next door.

      Also note that once you have a “blight fine ” you CANNOT pay your property taxes so they also start racking up interst at 18%.

      Lawyer fees to the city attoney doing the forecloser also are added fees ; ERIC HARD the lawyer is very compent and OK however, I think the whole blight ordanence should be reviewed to reflect current enviromental understanding, lawns are outdated in view of global warming and enviromental degredation. Not having a lawn is by choice, not negligence. I do not want a lawn, do not have a lawn and consume no fossil fuel maintaining a lawn. I have heated with wood since 1987 . Lawn services have become a big business, with chemical fertilizer and pesticide applications and noisy polluting mowers…hauled around by huge pickup trucks, all consuming non renewable resources. NG Change the law. HOw did these blight laws come about anyway?? Did citizens vote on them?? When I lived in Haddam for thirty years the Part time ZEO tried to get a blightlaw “With teeth” to quote him but I think the citizens at the meeting had a mental image of the teeth ripping into them… Comittee never came backwith an ordanince. Did Middletown citizens get to vote on what they have? How can it be changed to consider current enviromental realities?? If not why not?? Pete Smith 212 Sisk ST 860 345 4117

  4. Mr. Smith should not be thrown and forced to change his life for nobody in the city of Middletown, Connecticut government. They should find a solution to help him rather than what I call steal his property. He paid big money for his negligence in fines already. Since he owns the property and wants trees and whatever nature he wants that is his call and not the City of Middletown. The city of Middletown just wants more money to spend foolishly. Doing this is what communism is all about which is taking what they want. In this day and age I would not rule out corruption either. Very sad the City of Middletown has to resort to this. Worst thing is they can do it to any resident in their city.

    1. Disagree about the slander of “communism” We dont live under communism rather we live under “Capitalism” Greed is all the motive needed to take someones property. The realestate people after my property are just like the people who got the East Haddam govt to take my garndmothers property in Moodus during the late sixties redevolpment period; eminent domain, the citizens voted to approve it because the business men involved made false promised tto the citizens about bringing a real grocery store to town; in reality they benifited and the beautiful stone mill was destroyed. No store.

      My situation is more direct, get my property approved for multi unit low income housing, drive my family out with fines, fees, lawyer fees etc and a real estate firm gets more rental property. I saw the plans, talked with the 82 year old head of the family siting in his giant truck on white road trying to buy the property. I asked about the trees; he said they go in the chipper, told him to leave, not interested. I talked to MR Hazel the ZEO he said he would approve 212 Sisk for four units; the plans showed sis on both 212 sisk and 20 white RD. Went to the officewhen MR Hazel wasnt there, the mapping guy said it was R1a which is only one house ??? The city of Middletown doesnt want my property, the profit hungy realestate/ construction folks do. Who is my town goverment working for? What is the plan in P$Z?? More concrete, pavement, roof area? More heat island effect? More runoff and rapid stream rise? Less ground water replenishment? lAWNS and TREES or PAVEMENT and CONCRETE?? PFSmith 212 Sisk ST Middletown
      I agree with MR Grovers last sentence however the problem isnt comminism.

  5. Self-responsibility. You do have to maintain your property. However, that being said, in the days of unaffordability in the nation, people may not be able to purchase any equipment to help them do the job & they may not be able to afford landscapers. This is because the ever-encroaching reach of govt has taken every last dollar from us. It may a sign in the future that as govt takes more, people will have to forego things that are not essential.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *