Join the Conversation

11 Comments

    1. Uhhh, the article literally says he came here in 1990, under GHWB. Then he bought the school in Oct 2015, under Obama, and many of the allegations here were under Trump’s first administration. None of any of this has to do with federal immigration laws. Are you in any way aware how dumb that comment sounds?

  1. I am a private resident in the midst of the Putnam Science Academy. All of us on the street keep hoping Ding’s foibles will catch up with him and that the school will close. It’s hard to believe that hasn’t already happened. Can you send me a QR code for this article, please? I’d like to post it all over the street and ask the kids to forward the link to their parents. My street is, very literally, the school’s students’ main hallway between buildings all day (and night) long. I believe getting the word out to parents is crucial. Please send me the QR code for this article.

  2. I used to work here from 2020-2021 as kitchen staff/Maintenance. Honestly the worst job I’ve ever had in my life. There was a large chunk of time I was feeding all the kids in the whole school by myself. We would get verbally berated by management, and I had a panic attack almost every single day I had to work. There was also so much sketchy stuff going on in that school, and I can’t wait for it to get shut down.

  3. Yup. Having worked there during the time much of this occurred, I would say this article is very accurate!

  4. This article is highly informative but needs to focus solely on how this couple stole the school and its property from Mary. The situation is outrageous and unbelievable! The article is currently too long for most people to finish reading. It would be better presented as a series.

    1. Good morning! You’re hitting on some of the very same conversations we had internally when deciding how to present this. In the latest episode of Inside Update, we talked about both the length and why we didn’t do a series. You can check that out, here: https://insideinvestigator.org/inside-update/

      I’d love to share more about why we didn’t focus just on the “Mary” story too… the short answer is that there is a lot of unverifiable information. We understand how the partnership came to be, but there is a lot of “she said she said” that couldn’t be resolved enough for us to put out as high-quality journalism. I think we ended up cutting >1,500 words just in that section! Brandon had so many other sources to paint the bigger picture and that resulted in the editorial decision to give readers a broader understanding.

      Thank you for reading Inside Investigator and keep the suggestions coming – we’re all ears.

      Conner

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *