Connecticut has paid down more than $8 billion in its accumulated state employee (SERS) and teacher (CTRB) pension debt through the state’s fiscal guardrails, and that payoff will translate to $18.5 billion in annual payment (ADEC) savings and interest by 2049, according to a report newly released to Connecticut Comptroller Sean Scanlon.

“In summary for SERS, the total amounts transferred to SERS total $5.61 billion but will result in a reduction to the total ADECs through fiscal year ending 2049 of $11.93 billion,” the report by CavMac said. “For CTRB, the total amounts transferred to CTRB total $3.05 billion but will result in a reduction to the total ADECs through fiscal year ending 2049 of $6.49 billion.”

According to the audit firm, Connecticut taxpayers will be saving $737 million from the pension debt payoff in 2024 and, without further pay downs, those savings add up to more than $18 billion by 2049, the date Connecticut is projected to completely pay down the debt that has previously wreaked havoc with Connecticut’s budget.

The pension pay-downs are part of the 2017 “fiscal guardrails” put in place under the bipartisan budget agreement in 2017; the state transfers volatile surplus tax revenue from income taxes related to Wall Street earnings to the state’s rainy day fund and when that is full – which it has been for several years – the money is instead used to pay down the pension debt, which topped out at $22.2 billion for SERS in 2019 with a funding ration of only 32 percent, and $18 billion for CTRB in 2020, with only 51 percent funding ratio.

As of the latest pension valuations for 2024, SERS is now 55.2 percent funded with 19.1 billion in debt, and CTRB is 62.3 percent funded with $15.9 billion in unfunded liabilities. Although Connecticut has put more than $8 billion into the pension pay-downs, factors such as market performance, interest, inflation, salaries, mortality, and the number of new and retiring employees affect the overall totals.

According to the valuations, Connecticut’s annual payment toward SERS – the vast majority of which is to pay down the debt – will be reduced from $2.04 billion paid in fiscal year 2024 to $2.01 billion this fiscal year, and then an estimated $1.98 billion next fiscal year. 

For teacher pensions, however, the annual payment will actually increase from $1.6 billion to $1.65 billion, according to the latest valuation

A policy report from the Yankee Institute and Reason Foundation determined that if Connecticut continues making supplemental payments toward its pension debt, the state could potentially pay off the debt entirely a decade early, saving more than $6 billion in payments and interest costs, and argues for maintaining the fiscal guardrails.

“The fiscal guardrails have reversed decades of pension underfunding, improving Connecticut’s creditworthiness and financial stability,” the Yankee Institute/Reason report said. “This stronger financial position reduces the risk of future tax increases and allows for responsible tax reforms or increased social spending. Therefore, keeping the fiscal guardrails intact is a responsible fiscal policy that benefits the state’s employees, residents, businesses and taxpayers.”

Despite Connecticut saving hundreds of millions per year in annually required contributions and continuing to bring in surplus revenue, Connecticut is facing budgetary pressure once again as the very same fiscal guardrails that paid down the pension debt, are also limiting how much of that surplus revenue legislators can spend.

Connecticut is on track for a $1.4 billion surplus this fiscal year, followed by $1.2 billion surpluses in each of the next two fiscal years, according to the latest revenue forecasts, but most of that will go toward the volatility transfer, leaving the General Assembly with a more modest $71.2 million, according to consensus revenue numbers

Rising Medicaid costs, a higher education system whose representatives are clamoring for increased funding, the exhaustion of federal COVID dollars, and mounting pressure by municipalities for more education funding — combined with major state employee union contract negotiations on the horizon — means a lot of hands out and not much to go around, spurring calls by some Democrats, municipalities, and left-leaning policy organizations to adjust Connecticut’s fiscal guardrails to allow more spending of surplus revenue. 

General Assembly Republicans, however, have pushed back on this idea, and Gov. Ned Lamont and Comptroller Sean Scanlon have, to date, continued to tout the benefits of the fiscal controls, while acknowledging a need to balance fiscal stability with “current needs.”

“With easing inflation, solid wage growth, and our lowest unemployment rate since 2001, Connecticut is well-positioned to continue our fiscal and economic growth,” Scanlon said in a press release. “As we prepare for the next legislative session and biennium budget, our state must continue finding a balance between fiscal responsibility and addressing current needs.”

“Our revenues remain strong in virtually every area, reflecting that Connecticut’s economy is growing, thanks to low levels of unemployment and businesses moving and expanding across our state,” said Lamont’s budget chief Jeffrey Beckham in a press release. “Governor Lamont has made clear that he wants to help our families and businesses succeed, addressing the needs they have, while ensuring our state’s long-term financial health. As we develop the governor’s budget for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, we are listening carefully to the needs of our families and businesses to understand how we can best secure their futures.”

Was this article helpful?

Yes
No
Thanks for your feedback!

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Marc was a 2014 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow and formerly worked as an investigative reporter for Yankee Institute. He previously worked in the field of mental health and is the author of several books...

Join the Conversation

10 Comments

    1. Every time state employees get a raise the pension liability goes up also. Over 30% pay increases over the last few years creates a hole you can’t get out of. And everyone else gets stuck with the bill.

  1. The tax payers will never get a break. Because their greedy. The best thing to do is to move out of here.

  2. I’m glad all the retirees who are collecting pensions at 55 while working again in some other public sector position don’t have to sweat their non contributory pension going down or worse. It warms my heart to pay 10’s of thousands of dollars in property and income tax alone every year. Don’t worry, our family will continue to make due with the income we have – as always. You guys spend like drunken sailors and contemplate spending more of the “surplus” instead of paying down pension debt. No problem, happy to help!

    My MIL who retired from the state in her 50’s went to work for a city/town municipality and got a second pension is counting on us tax payers. (Even though she smugly claims “I pay taxes too!” Yeah…) Same for my BIL who retired with a fat pension from West Hartford and now double dips working for another city for more money than he made in WH! Pulling down damn near 200k salary and pension combined! They have to keep their wine cellar fully stocked and pay outright for their 2 kids college tuition, so you know. Pony up folks.

    I have a silly idea. Call me crazy, but how about we line everybody up, inform them they were sold pie in the sky promises. Then inform them the fund is insolvent, so it needs to be renegotiated. But, we still have a heart and a promise is a promise so read on…

    Here’s my suggestion…it’s a doozy! Ready? We stop anyone who is under retirement age, say 65 or maybe even 67, from getting a pension! Now hold on, it gets better…we then inform them they will STILL GET their same pension, but not until they actually decide to retire and draw social security benefits! This way, we don’t have 45 year old cops retiring with a $75k pension and going to work for another town and pulling in another 6 figures! (and possibly even another pension!) Same for people like the superintendent of schools in Bloomfield. He retired from that very successful school district called “Hartford”, collects his FAT pension and because of his great success turning Hartford into a national model of what (not) to do, he now makes $175k per year in Bloomfield! Talk about banking Benjamins!

    How about them apples? The money saved from not paying pensions to people NOT of retirement age would pay the debt in NO TIME. Make them, pay for, their own, pension debt! …and leave us flogged tax payers alone! What a friggin concept!

  3. First, Surplus = Over Taxation. It should be returned to the tax payers as let’s not forget it is our hard earned money in the first place. Second, no mention of actually having state employees and teachers contributing increased amounts to align with what folks in the private sector have to in their 401k’s (pension, what’s that?) in order to retire somewhat comfortably. Let’s get real and stop the nonsense.

    1. The city of Manchester went to a contributory pension program about 15 years ago. I was flat shocked! Our property taxes even went down (for a year anyway.) They are still grossly too high. If I moved to a Southern state, I could fully fund a Roth IRA with just the property tax savings!

      I still say no one in the public sector should get a pension before retirement age. People retiring with full pensions in their 40’s is madness. It’s is absurd at best.

    2. No let it collect interest and used to build an interest paying position to reduce the tax payers burden.

  4. Connecticut is broke because of corrupt Connecticut state workers, who pad their pockets. One should read Connecticut’s actual constitution and see how illegal it actually is, because of corrupt Connecticut state workers.

    Until the citizens ban together and legally sue the governor, who overseas the workforce, then we will forever be in debt, ware a portion of the workforce actually doesn’t work.

    Check out me legal GoFundMe page under JJ Fox, Manchester, CT and see how your tax dollars are misused.

    Corrupt Connecticut state workers focus more on remaining corrupt, as they bully and abuse others. Time to hold them legally accountable for all of their illegal activities.

    It takes 1 person to make a difference, which is needed more than ever. Most of Connecticut bridges aren’t safe to drive over, with paint peeling away, falling on cars during their daily commute.

  5. Criminal justice reform. They have closed prisons and are saving on the prosecution of crimes. Reporting low crime statistics. All the money is going to the state. The people living in the state are not getting the benefits. They used 22 thousand dollars for a party for the public defender office. They are not giving funds to support victims services. They got caught reporting low crime rates. They plea bargaing and dropping charges. There are community patrol in Hartford of citizens trying to keep communities safe. All benefiting the state employees. The benefits of criminal justice reform are for the financial benefit of the state not the people living in it. The police department are not supported, no justice for victims

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *