At a press conference held by Senate and House Republicans before an informational hearing on Connecticut’s homeschooling regulations, Alicia Teitelbaum is handing out facemasks like it’s 2020 again. On her own facemask is written, “Forced Silent.”

Teitelbaum was there with her colleague, Kenyetta Hayes, who spoke during the spirited press conference. They are both part of a homeschooling co-op of roughly fifty families in Fairfield County; they’re both Democrats, and they both say their homeschooling voices were silenced by Democratic leaders of the Committee on Children and the Education Committee in favor of voices more supportive of expanding Connecticut’s homeschool regulations.

The informational hearing was held to assess whether the state of Connecticut has enough oversight of homeschooling children following the horrific imprisonment and abuse of a child for decades in Waterbury after he was removed from the public school system, allegedly under the guise of being homeschooled, in a story that has made national headlines.

The Office of the Child Advocate (OCA) contends that Connecticut’s lax oversight of homeschooling allows abusive or neglectful parents to keep their children out of the view of mandated reporters and offered a troubling report about the number of homeschool families with DCF records. The OCA gave several legislative proposals the morning of the hearing, including independently evaluating homeschooled children to ensure academic progress and updating the Department of Children and Families (DCF) criteria for educational neglect and investigation.

Homeschool advocates argue they are being made scapegoats for the failures of state agencies like the DCF and should not be judged by public school systems that fail children and occasionally fail to report abuse and neglect of their students.

The hearing drew thousands of homeschooling parents and their children to the Capitol Monday, who overwhelmed the Legislative Office Building and whose chants outside the informational hearing could be heard on video. Like Teitelbaum and Hayes, many of them argued their voices were being silenced.

Informational hearings are not public hearings; committee chairs invite speakers to gather information for legislative purposes and therefore seek out the heads of state agencies, and organizations that can offer wide and well-researched viewpoints. Some key homeschool organizations were left off the list, however, garnering criticism from attendees and Republicans, who claimed that the hearing was essentially rigged against the homeschoolers.

“We have a room full of people and far more people, parents, and children outside this room that don’t even get an opportunity to speak today,” Senate Republican leader Stephen Harding, R-Brookfield, said at the opening of the press conference. “They deserve an opportunity to speak, and they are not being provided that opportunity for a very particular reason and we know it.”

Sen. Harding speaks at Republican press conference. Credit: Marc Fitch

Teitelbaum says she and Kenyetta were initially contacted by the Connecticut Homeschool Network (CHN) to speak at the hearing, particularly as they’re Democrats living in Fairfield County and three of the four co-chairs of the committees – Sen. Ceci Maher, D-Darien, Rep. Corey Paris, D-Stamford, and Rep. Jennifer Leeper, D-Fairfield — were Democrats representing Fairfield County. 

“CHN asked us to speak because three out of the four co-chairs are all Fairfield County representatives, and they are the ones pushing for this,” Teitelbaum said. “They were trying to make a point to say your constituents don’t want this.”

But on the Friday before the Monday hearing Teitelbaum and Hayes found out they were excluded from the list of people testifying, purportedly because the committee was looking for voices that represented the whole state — but they were not the only ones allegedly left off the list. 

TEACH CT, a statewide Christian homeschooling network that is well-known at the Capitol, was also excluded from the hearing – something that was criticized by Teitelbaum, Hayes, and several other homeschool advocates, because it is one of the largest homeschool organizations in Connecticut.

Timothy Knotts, president of TEACH CT, says he was originally recommended to speak at the hearing by ranking members Rep. Anne Dauphinais, R-Killingly, and Rep. Lezlye Zupkus, R-Prospect, and was under the impression the ranking members’ requests would be honored. He then found on Friday that he would not be testifying. Instead, Knotts spoke at the Republican press conference and sat in the audience during the hearing.

“They [Dauphinais and Hayes] both recommended TEACH CT as a subject matter expert with a lot to share. We’ve been doing this for thirty years, we are made up of homeschooling families, some second-generation homeschooling Connecticut families,” Knotts said outside the hearing.

Reached for comment, Rep. Dauphinais said she offered the committee chairs five individuals across three organizations to speak on behalf of homeschoolers, as some of the proposed speakers had prior commitments and were unsure whether they could testify. That included two names from the Connecticut Homeschool Network (CHN), two names from TEACH CT, and Kenyetta Hayes. 

“The response given back was Kenyetta couldn’t speak because she wasn’t a statewide group,” Dauphinais said. But when the list of expert speakers was released, only the two individuals she recommended on behalf of CHN were on the list.

Dauphinais says the committee chairs had essentially split CHN into two by including CHN President Diane Connors as one speaker, and CHN’s attorney Deborah Stevenson as a second speaker, but in this case representing the larger National Home Education Defense League.

“We did not submit [Stevenson’s] name as part of a national group, we submitted her name as the attorney for CHN,” Dauphinais said. “They took the names and separated them on the agenda like they were speaking for two different groups. It was clearly contrived.”

Informational hearing before the Committee on Children and the Education Committee. Credit: Marc Fitch

At the same time, the committee added Beau Triba, purportedly speaking on behalf of the Coalition for Responsible Home Education (CRHE), which is based in Massachusetts, and advocates for homeschool regulation nationally. The other individuals and agencies testifying were the commissioners of the Connecticut State Department of Education, and the Department of Children and Families; the executive directors of the Office of the Child Advocate and the Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents.

“It was clearly set up in favor of the groups who wanted more regulation of homeschoolers,” Dauphinais said. “I believe the whole hearing and forum was sabotaged against the homeschoolers.”

“TEACH CT had expected to be on the agenda but was booted off for reasons unknown at this point,” attorney Stevenson said during the hearing. “I think that’s an affront, because this is a state issue, it’s not a national issue, and in place of TEACH CT, I gather that the Coalition for Responsible Home Education was put in their place, which is a national group and has really no connections here in Connecticut, other than to lobby this entity.”

According to their website, CRHE was founded in 2013 by homeschool alumni who either experienced or witnessed forms of neglect or abuse and believe there should be more government oversight of homeschooling. 

“We all knew that homeschooling was sometimes used to isolate children and hide child abuse,” CHRE’s website states — essentially the exact concern that was being raised by the committees and the OCA. CHRE maintains a database of reported homeschool abuse and neglect cases.

Triba, a Connecticut native, testified that he was homeschooled by abusive parents using a religious program called Classical Conversations, and that much of his education was inaccurate. According to his statements, his mother would lie on his transcripts, he never received help after a suicide attempt, and he had no adults outside the religious homeschooling community to turn to for help.

“Stories like mine continue to happen right under your nose,” Triba said during the hearing. “There are hundreds of cases in the public record of caregivers using the cover of homeschooling to abuse and neglect their children.”

The exclusion of TEACH CT and the inclusion of the CHRE was seen by some as unfair, allowing Triba to recount personal testimony critical of religious homeschooling and not giving TEACH CT – nor Classical Conversations – a chance to offer their own testimony.

Under questioning by Dauphinais, Triba said he didn’t represent any families in Connecticut and was there on his own account as a member of CHRE. Dauphinais responded that it was unfortunate that TEACH CT and Classical Conversations wasn’t given the chance to address the hearing.

“It’s discrimination against a religious group, in my opinion, because Beau Triba vocalized heavily his disdain for this religious program and they weren’t given an opportunity to testify at all, and you would have heard another side of that,” Dauphinais said to Inside Investigator. “It was clearly, clearly planned against the homeschoolers. There were dozens of Classical Conversation families in the Capitol, and they weren’t given a chance to speak.”

Teitelbaum said it was “frustrating” that Triba was allowed to give a personal testimony but no homeschool families were allowed the same opportunity.

Reached for comment by email, Rep. Leeper said TEACH CT “was never invited by the Chairs to be a subject matter expert, so their organization was not pushed aside in favor of someone else.”

“Similarly, since the Committee Chairs held discretion over speakers, the CT Homeschool Network did not have the authority to invite other individuals or entities to speak at the informational hearing,” Leeper said. “Our committees heard from a wide variety of organizations on Monday, covering the spectrum of the homeschooling debate. Beyond the informational hearing, we have heard individually from hundreds of members of the homeschooling community sharing their perspectives, lived experiences, and concerns.”

When asked what he would have said to the committees were he invited to testify, Knotts said, “We, as parents, have a God-given right and a constitutional right to educate our children.” 

“It’s really only when we abrogate that right, when we give it up, when we don’t take the responsibility to do what we’ve been called to do, that the government rightly steps in,” Knotts said. “For the government to say we think there may be, possibly, some homeschoolers out there that we don’t know about that might not be doing a good job of this, therefore all homeschoolers must be regulated so we can check in and see what you’re doing and how your kids are when we have zero evidence that you’re not doing it well, is a clear abridgment of that right,” Knotts continued.

Outside the hearing, Teitelbaum alluded to the fact – as many did that day — that Hartford Public Schools is currently being sued by a student who allegedly graduated without the ability to read and write as evidence that public schools don’t necessarily teach students to the standards the state sets for itself, let alone homeschooling families.

Many also noted that children in the public school system are abused by their parents with no reports coming from the schools, or even abused by teachers, and that often those cases slip through the cracks, including in the Waterbury case.

During the hearing, DCF Commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly said DCF had located records of investigating the case in Waterbury, and that staff followed all “policies and protocols,” meaning there must be a “systemic gap somewhere.”

“Once we go in and respond, there are limitations to what we can do in response to the information that we have,” Hill-Lilly said, “and I will tell you, based on our preliminary review, our staff followed their policies and protocols, there was not a deviation from practice and protocol. Which means there is a systemic gap somewhere.”

Teitelbaum also pointed to this year’s announcement that the winning team for the Connecticut State Science Olympiad was a Fairfield County homeschooling team, which will now go on to a national competition in Nebraska, as evidence that homeschooling can be just as effective, if not more effective, than public schools.

“You’re welcome, Connecticut,” she said.

Was this article helpful?

Yes
No
Thanks for your feedback!

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Marc was a 2014 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow and formerly worked as an investigative reporter for Yankee Institute. He previously worked in the field of mental health and is the author of several books...

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

  1. Sounds like the current Majority Party once again has a solution, and are looking for a problem.

  2. “abuse of a child for decades in Waterbury after he was removed from the public school system, allegedly under the guise of being homeschooled” – Stop lying. It’s was not under the guise of being homeschooled. This has nothing to do with homeschooling. The mother lied at the time and told the school he was transferring to another public school. She then stopped sending him to school all together. DCF received dozens of called for that kid and only ever made 2 visits. Where is the emergency informational hearing on the failure of DCF?

  3. I really don’t understand what the commonly proposed regulations have to do with the big problem. The regulations many other states generally involve some level of ACADEMIC accountability, but the problem is that some kids are being abused and neglected. The driving factors behind this particular push are situations where the children were known to be abused while in public school and then became truant (neither the man from Waterbury nor Matthew Tirado were ever actually homeschooled or even withdrawn from public school). For kids that fell through the cracks like this, how would homeschooling regulations have helped them? How would curriculum reviews or testing help children who are simply… missing? How would it help children being abused while in public school, or while still too young to be in any school? While we know that many calls to CPS turn out to be unfounded, and we know that DCF is understaffed and overworked, we also know that DCF failed these two children. Homeschooling had nothing to do with it.

    Public schooled kids are frequently seen by mandated reporters. This is true for most homeschooled kids as well (doctors, coaches, etc). Abuse is still missed or explained away.

    Public schooled kids frequently fall through the cracks academically. Ask me – I was smart enough to average a passing grade despite many topics and concepts that I did not grasp before the class moved on, and there were many other important areas of study that were hardly touched at all. I’m pushing 40 and realizing a lot of ADHD criteria fit me, as I research it for my youngest child. I’ve been homeschooling my children for more than ten years and know that their education will not be perfect either, but there is a lot of accountability (by me) to make sure they are actually learning before we move on. This means pacing may vary, supplemental instruction may be brought in, and what defines a “school year” may also be flexible (and in our case, is not the same for each child). Academic regulations would further complicate all the decision-making as I try to do what is best for each child.

    So what do you do to try to prevent these wrong and scary things, or to catch them quickly before someone else dies or sets their house on fire to escape it? Can anything be done? Can we assume every parent (and I mean EVERY parent) is guilty until proven innocent? I just don’t think we can do that. I don’t have an answer to the Big Problem. My only suggestion is to get to know your neighbors. This is Connecticut. Most of us don’t live too far from anyone else. I know the faces I see in the windows near me. I know how old the neighbor kids are and some of their struggles and victories, and can eyeball if they’ve gone through a growth spurt. Some are younger than school age. Some are in homeschool or public school. Some have graduated but have special needs and live with their parents. All of these kids will have some gaps in their education (especially the one who missed some big concepts in the upper elementary years during COVID), but I can tell you that all of them have parents who love them and advocate for them.

  4. I’m not sure why some are sooo upset. They are looking out for our children. 1 child abused us too much. While many homeschooling children are well cared for and are seen by many mandated reporters, the state is concerned about those children that are not. They just want some minimum requirements or something like that. If parents are abusing or neglecting their children they probably are not taking them to the library or park, putting them in after school activities, taking them to the doctor regularly. I’d say get over it. I’m not a fan of a lot of things, but I do it. All these parents that weren’t their a d couldn’t speak probably wasn’t going to change anyone’s opinion. Its the parents who are abusing or neglecting their kids are either not showing up or lying.

  5. I was “un-schooled” and homeschooled from 5th-8th and 9th-12th grade. I had mental health issues, as well as untreated ADHD, that were only made worse by the lack of regime/discipline and socialization that comes with traditional schooling. I understand parents fear of public schools, I myself only attended charter schools. Requiring regulations to ensure homeschooled children are having their mental and physical needs met is a good thing! If that scares you… you should be scared, and you should do better.
    I turn 20 in june. I tremendously regret not pushing through (or being pushed through) in person school. I never got my GED. I’ll be attending a college course this fall, which I only got in by faking my high-school transcripts. The longest I’ve held a job was 6 months, and I’ve been unemployed for the year since quitting.
    People always say I’m so smart and mature, and I know I am, but it’s all wasted potential because nobody forced me to not give up.

    Nobody is saying homeschooling needs to be out lawed. They’re saying children, and their right to adequate education, need to be protected! Kids don’t realize how vital education is, and some parents don’t care to ensure their child will thrive as adults.

    1. Go back to r/HomeschoolRecovery. Abusive homeschool parents weren’t magically going to be well adjusted if you were in public school.

      If you want to advocate for something then fix the public schools so that those of us that aren’t total jackasses and/or abusive to our children find public school a compelling offer.

    2. Thank you for sharing your story. I hear you. I’m proud of you for pursuing higher education.

  6. “CHRE maintains a database of reported homeschool abuse and neglect cases.”

    Someone in Connecticut needs to keep a record of all the abuse that happens in public schools, let’s see which list is longer.
    This same group is lobbying to change the laws in Illinois. I homeschooled my son because an EMS had to be called to treat an injury at a public school, because he was attacked by another student. He is now in the second year of his master’s degree and he is only 23, just married, paying all his own bills.

    I’m currently homeschooling my daughter because I gave public school another chance, and when she was diagnosed with audio processing disorder, the IEP was only going to give her 5 mins extra on tests! We were spending hours reteaching the material she didn’t hear during class time, while doing her homework. We offered to purchase a remote microphone system for her but we were denied because it would be too distracting for the other students. In homeschool, she can read material again, re-watch videos until she processes the information.

    If this bill looks anything like the one presented in Illinois, here are the problems:
    It gives the state board of education too much power, the state board of education has a financial interest in denying my homeschool to get my daughter in a seat and an extra $14k (a town near me gets $44k/student) going to public school. I only have one child, imagine a five child household and how much of a target they would be!

    If someone reports me (think spiteful mother in law, nosy neighbor) or I don’t fill out the form, a truant officer will come to my home and interview my minor child (alone?) and ask to see my portfolio. What if they don’t like my science curriculum, or my history isn’t progressive enough. Will they deny my homeschool and fine me up to $500 and 30 days in jail? At that point does my kid go into the system because I have a record? This is a fast track for parents to go to the criminal justice system, and a stripping away of parental rights! The state thinks they know better on how to parent my child.
    The states need to clean their own house (DCF, public schools) before coming after mine!

  7. This committee’s thoughts are they are better fit to protect children than their families. The state is incapable of providing a solid education or protecting the students of CT. The state has a long list of failures on their account that they want to ignore. Stop trying to control families and fix what they’re already in charge of!

    1. No one is trying to control families. Can you admit that some parents abuse children? Do you have any empathy for those children? The State is trying to protect them .

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *