According to meeting minutes, Norwalk’s Water and Pollution Control Authority (WPCA) recently used $100,260 of city sewer funds for the purchase of two Tesla Y models, to be used by all city departments, in furtherance of the city’s green initiative. 

“So as all of you are aware we are changing our fleet to a green fleet,” said Vanessa Valadares, Norwalk’s Chief of Operations and Public Works and a sitting member of the WPCA’s board at a June 17 meeting. “So as part of trying to be the greenest city in Connecticut, the mayor has asked us that for all the new purchases of vehicles, we try to buy either electric or hybrid.”

The June 17 meeting ended with a 4-1 vote in favor of authorizing the purchase of the Teslas. Valadares said that the purchases had already been approved by Norwalk’s Common Council and Public Works Committee. WPCA Chair Darren Oustafine was the only member of the board to question the usage of sewer funds to purchase the vehicles.

“It’s always been my understanding that WPCAs were created in the first place because, in some other towns, the sewer-use fee ends up being used as a way to tax,” said Oustafine, citing an example of another town he heard had used its sewer money to pave roads. “Somebody said, ‘We have to establish a WPCA so that when we collect money to treat sewage, that money is going to be used to treat the sewage and not to pave roads.’”

Oustafine asked how many cars WPCA employees currently use. Ralph Kolb, Board Member and Senior Environmental Engineer for the DPW’s Operations Division, said that the WPCA typically uses two cars a day, sourcing cars from the DPW fleet, or using the foreman’s or their own personal vehicles.

“Are we getting rid of any of our existing vehicles that are delegated to the WPCA specifically?,” asked Outsafine. Valadares explained that the plan is to add the Teslas to the existing fleet, though she also said in a June 11 Common Council Meeting that the cars were meant to replace two Ford Explorers. She said the City’s cars fall under “one umbrella,” and get rotated to different departments. She said that the city planned to purchase four cars in total, but that the WPCA would fund two of them.

“I don’t mean to be blunt but, what assurances do we have that these cars will be dedicated to the WPCA?,” asked Oustafine. “Are we sure that these cars are going to be used by WPCA employees?”

Valadares said that the cars would “definitely be used by people related to WPCA,” but also told Oustafine that “even if the cars are not there all day, and ended up being relocated to whoever will have the best use out of the car, there will be [other] cars available to them [WPCA employees].”

Valadares then said outright that the usage of WPCA funds to purchase them is to “try to minimize the costs through the departments.” When asked by Oustafine whether the cars would be parked at Norwalk’s Water Pollution Control Facility on South Smith Street or at City Hall, Valadares said “it depends who is using them.”

“So I’ll say it back and see if I understand,” said Oustafine. “So we don’t mind sharing?”

“Correct,” said Valadares.

Per the WPCA’s own financial bylaws, excess revenues are to be deposited in the WPCA’s reserves, used on outstanding debt, or used for the purchase of capital assets, the latter of the three presumably being the category which the Teslas would fall under. Per the local law that established the WPCA, the WPCA’s director, “shall have the authority to contract for the procurement of goods and services, including for the day-to-day operations of the treatment plant and collection system, as may be necessary, in accordance with procedures established by the WPCA.” Furthermore, local laws state that, “all revenues and costs of operations of the WPCA shall be accounted for separately from the other operations of the City.”

While the Teslas ostensibly will see WPCA use, members of both the Public Works Committee and the Common Council could hardly contain their own excitement to use them. Every Public Works Committee member voted in favor of the purchase except for Dajuan Wiggins, who abstained.

“I think this is tremendously useful for the city, I think it will be a great step forward,” said Public Works Committee member Nora Niedzielski-Eichner, in the June 4 meeting that approved their purchase. “I’m excited, and I hope everyone has fun driving them!” 

The excitement of city council members was also palpable. Councilmember Dajuan Wiggins joked, “Are these cars – are they just the cars or are they going to get a Cyber Truck? If so, I would love to drive them.”

In the Common Council meeting, Valadares said that the Department of Public Works has been looking to replace Ford Explorers in its fleet for some time, and that the Teslas have proven most advantageous due to the speed of their delivery and a $7,500 tax rebate the Town would receive upon their purchase.

“We looked at other options, I know some people may be thinking, ‘Oh, we’re gonna buy a Tesla?,” said Valadares. “We looked at a lot of Fords, we looked at a lot of Toyotas, the Chevys, but for now, what is available and what we can get our hands on, at this price range, Tesla is the most competitive.”

WPCA Boardmember’s Mayor Harry Rilling, Valadares, Ed Abrams, and Kolb, and Dylene Bird and Chris Torre of the City’s Operations Division did not respond to Inside Investigator’s requests for comment.

Was this article helpful?

Yes
No
Thanks for your feedback!

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

A Rochester, NY native, Brandon graduated with his BA in Journalism from SUNY New Paltz in 2021. He has three years of experience working as a reporter in Central New York and the Hudson Valley, writing...

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

  1. Way to go Darren Oustafine!! We should know where taxpayer money is going. We should be questioning who will be using these cars.
    Shouldn’t the sewer tax money go towards improving the sewer plant considering all of the recent apartments/ condos being built in our city ??

    1. Sounds like Darren Oustafine is the only representative who is honest and is truly speaking for the tax payers of Norwalk.

  2. On, so you want to use green energy. I’m all for that but Tesla? You could buy at least 2-3 other cars for the price probably. What a waste of taxpayer funds. And I wonder who ‘related to this department’ gets to drive it home for the weekend?

  3. The whole is disgusting, how about you fix the horrible roads in this town before you spend our money on the virtual signaling cars. Oh wait, that’s right. You fixed Shore Haven Road and spar road and Island drive !

  4. Good reporting, but this is small potatoes compared to the millions vanishing from city finances from incompetence and sometimes outright malfeasance. Take a look at the 2x market rate land purchases for the new SoNo school. Single source no bid contracts to donors. And the albatross of NHS hatched by someone under federal indictment for steering contracts.

  5. Why the most expensive vehicle. , these people really think they are special and better than the pet whose money they use !!! Disgusting

  6. The city doesn’t pay taxes, so unless they are leasing the vehicles the $7500 rebate is meaningless. Do they really not understand this?

  7. Thank you, Darren Oustafine, for bringing voice of reason. It is always easier to spend someone else’s money.
    Electric, instead of Hybrid (that self charges). Evilsource will be happy to take more of our tax dollars to charge the cars. Or does the city not pay what it’s citizens do for its use?

  8. How sad is this mind-set for “being green”. How misguided, how bizarre the actions of the bureaucracy. To date, electric cars are a myopic “clean” vehicle. The ravaging of environments, battery production causes down stream, is shocking enough for a witness to vomit. Overall, it’s about as clean as an open sewer; more like the toxic canal of NYC. The problem is not just corruption but plain ignorance and stupidity.

    1. Our mission as a nonprofit newsroom extends only to the realm of rooting out corruption through investigative journalism. However, I also do not know where in Connecticut questions about stupidity, ignorance, and morality are asked and answered productively right now. We certainly welcome them in our comments section.

  9. We have been in contact with Norwalk since December to take responsibility for damaging our connection to the sewer line beneath the road in front of our home and repair an open storm drain pipe in the same location that leaks into our property. Norwalk’s insurance claimed “governmental immunity” despite two DPW employees examining the site and saying the city is at fault. Norwalk uses $100k of taxes they levy on taxpayers for use of the sewer line to buy vehicles that run on electricity while they shirk responsibility for the damage they did to sewer connect and my property? To add insult to injury, we pay the highest electric rates in the contiguous US and now have to pay a “public benefit” on top of our high rates. So how does an electric vehicle make sense for the city? Not a good look for Norwalk.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *