Join the Conversation

6 Comments

  1. It seems to me town leadership failed the Seniors of this community by failing to have a discussion with the volunteers that had been getting it done for years!
    Instead they pulled the carpet out from under volunteers that have led this effort, for no reason at all!
    Shame on this first Selectmam, former Selectmam, and town council members. You should be ashamed of yourselves!
    More examples of Socialism in Connecticut!

  2. Why is it the town responsibility to rent a building to entertain seniors and to hold other community events? That’s not what government was ever for nor should it be now. I’m sure taxpayers would rather have non-profit groups, no matter how great their programs are, paying for their own building. This outcome sounds like it may actually work out in the best interest of the majority of Barkhamsted residents and electors who are squeezed under the heavy burden of taxes that pay for things that shouldn’t be under the purview of government. It’s wonderful that there are so many independent clubs and groups in town. They should get together and rent that building or another themselves and take it off the town tax rolls. It should be 1 less expense for taxpayers rather than a new project that the former Selectman takes on.

  3. There are two missing elements in this narrstive:
    First, any dialogue between Lukiwsky and the seniors’ organization in advance of seizing control of the Center.
    Second, the identity of the person or group that wanted to use the Center but couldn’t, then complained to Lukiwsky that he, she, or they had been denied use of it.
    It’s no secret the Center has long had a “no politcs” policy, which leads me to assume it was a political group that had been denied use of the Center, then complained to Lukiwsky, who seized the Center and ejected the Seniors.
    This is all speculation, of course, but it sure seems reasonable.

  4. What a farce. Because the seniors wanted a space free from politics, the town leadership decided they needed to be in control. Nick Lukiwsky unilaterally decided they could no longer allow “unsupervised volunteers” ~ really? I’m pretty sure our government was meant to be supervised by the citizens, not the other way around. The senior center volunteers seem to have worked well for the past 34 years. Maybe there will be a welcome change in the type of leadership in town.

  5. I attended an event last year at the senior center, the place was a mess, old clutter everywhere, the building in need of cleaning and repair. The event, that was run by the volunteers at that time, was very unorganized and centered around a select few. I would not make a 2nd visit to this place unless there was change. Hopefully the change in authority will be a good thing.

  6. I was a member of Barkhamsted Seniors about 15 years. Quit going when Dave Roberts “took over” Stony Hill Village senior housing in Granby. Targeted harassment is a hate crime, and David has shown his true colors. I was harassed, lied about, villified, and beat up by board of directors employee.. who just does’nt get arrested. There are big problems that started with David’s arrival. I have recently left Granby.
    I had quit going to Barkhamsted Seniors after a friend of David’s got an apartment without being on any wait list as required for federally funded housing. Favors.
    After hearing about the bs at the Barkhamsted seniors, I went to check it out myself. David tried to tell folks some bs about me while I was having breakfast. These folks knew me, but David did not know I had been a member for years. The big split happened after.
    I fully support and thank the town for stepping up and returning the Barkhamsted Senior Center to being a place of welcome.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *