Skip to content
Menu

Connecticut voters approve early voting, but legal hurdle remains

Connecticut voters on Tuesday approved a ballot measure that will permit the legislature to pass a law allowing early voting in the state. With over 95 percent of the votes in, the ballot question passed with 60.4 percent voting in favor of the measure and 39.6 opposed.

The ACLU of Connecticut Rise PAC, which recently conducted the first public opinion poll of the year surveying predominantly voters of color on their thoughts on early voting, said that the ballot question was a matter of racial justice in the state. 

“By embracing early voting, Connecticut voters have taken action for racial justice and sent a strong message that we want the ballot box to be more accessible for all eligible voters,” David McGuire, ACLU of Connecticut Rise PAC chairperson, said. “Our state has a long and shameful history of creating barriers to the ballot box that most hurt Black and Latinx voters, but now, Connecticut voters have started to topple those racist hurdles. Voting on Election Day is not easy for everyone and early voting will strengthen our democracy.”

However, while voters approved the measure and have given the General Assembly the green light to craft a constitutional amendment to allow early voting, first the measure must pass a legal hurdle. On Monday, Noemi Soto, a New Britain resident, filed a lawsuit arguing that the constitutional amendment is unlawful.

According to the lawsuit, Soto claims she is “in danger of losing substantial rights, power and privilege over ballot security and election integrity” and is seeking to have the amendment declared “legally null and void in its entirety.”

The lawsuit says a change in the bill introduced in 2019, SJ-14, which proposed a constitutional amendment to allow early voting and was approved by a legislative committee but was never voted on in the House or Senate, is different from HJ-59, which did pass the House and Senate.

The difference, according to the lawsuit, is the removal of language stating that the election results submitted to the Secretary of State’s office must be done “under seal”, eliminating the need for a wax seal on the results. 

After a hearing in Hartford Superior Court on Tuesday, Judge Cesar Noble continued the case until next week, setting a status conference for Nov. 16th.

Should the constitutional amendment survive the legal challenge, Connecticut would be the 47th state to enact some kind of early voting measure. As of right now, Connecticut is one of only four states in the country without early voting, the other three states being Alabama, New Hampshire and Oregon, the latter of which conducts their elections primarily through mail-in ballots. 

News & Investigations Straight To Your Inbox

Name

Ending corruption is a no-brainer. Investigative journalism shines a light on the stories that need to be told. Sign up to get our free emails and we’ll send you an END CORRUPTION sticker as a thank-you for your support.

CLICK HERE TO CLAIM YOUR FREE STICKER

Subscribe

"*" indicates required fields

Name
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Avatar photo

Tom Hopkins

A national, award-winning journalist from Bristol, Tom has a passion for writing. Prior to joining CII, he worked in print, television, and as a freelance journalist. He has taken deep dives into sexual assault allegations by Connecticut professors, uncovered issues at state-run prisons, and covered evictions in the New Britain Herald. He chose to focus on issues based in Connecticut because this is his home, and this is where he wants his work to make the greatest impact.

2 Comments

  1. Nicola charlowe
    November 13, 2022 @ 8:27 am

    Early/mail in voting should be available to those who are out of state/country, active service people and those that are mobility limited. There is ample time to request a mail in ballot, but blanket main in voting is criminal. If you can’t vote because it is an “inconvenience”, remember the inconvenience of those who died so you CAN vote. ,If it’s too much a bother maybe you shouldn’t vote!

    Reply

  2. Tracy McKeon
    November 14, 2022 @ 11:32 am

    Unbelievable how this is a racist issue. Is that anything like requiring ID? You need ID for your doctor appointment, buy alcohol, fly in an airplane, or a variety of other things. How is that racist? Every American citizen should have ID or they can’t participate. If you are not an American citizen, you do not have a valid ID. Can you show your utility bill when you want to buy a 6-pack of Budweiser? This is opening the door to illegals voting. What is the ACLU’s real agenda?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *